Qwen3.7-MaxvsGLM-5.1
Qwen3.7-Max | GLM-5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 744B |
Context window | — | 200k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 22% |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 60.6% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 75% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 69.7%Best | 63.5% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 52.3% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 92.4%Best | 86.2% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1518 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | May 20 2026 | Apr 7 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Qwen3.7-Max or GLM-5.1?
Qwen3.7-Max leads GLM-5.1 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.0, GPQA Diamond). GLM-5.1 shipped 43 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3.7-Max is proprietary, while GLM-5.1 is open weight.
On Terminal-Bench 2.0, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 69.7% vs GLM-5.1 at 63.5%. On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 92.4% vs GLM-5.1 at 86.2%.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
GLM-5.1 was released by Z.ai on Apr 7 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on Terminal-Bench 2.0 — Qwen3.7-Max 69.7% vs GLM-5.1 63.5%.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.7-Max 92.4% vs GLM-5.1 86.2%.
Qwen3.7-Max is a proprietary model released by Qwen. GLM-5.1 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.