Qwen3.7-MaxvsGLM-4.7
Qwen3.7-Max | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 60.6% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 73.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 69.7%Best | 41% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 92.4%Best | 85.7% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | May 20 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Qwen3.7-Max or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3.7-Max leads GLM-4.7 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.0, GPQA Diamond). GLM-4.7 shipped 149 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3.7-Max is proprietary, while GLM-4.7 is open weight.
On Terminal-Bench 2.0, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 69.7% vs GLM-4.7 at 41%. On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 92.4% vs GLM-4.7 at 85.7%.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on Terminal-Bench 2.0 — Qwen3.7-Max 69.7% vs GLM-4.7 41%.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.7-Max 92.4% vs GLM-4.7 85.7%.
Qwen3.7-Max is a proprietary model released by Qwen. GLM-4.7 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GLM-4.7vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.7vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-4.7vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.7vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5GLM-4.7vsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-4.7vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731