Qwen3.5vsGLM-4.5-Air
Qwen3.5 | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 397B | 106B |
Context window | 1M | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76.4%Best | 59.8% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 69.3% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 52.5% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 69% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 28.7% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 88.4% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 62.2% | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 79% | — |
Multimodal MMMUTests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 85% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Feb 16 2026 | Jul 28 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: Qwen3.5 or GLM-4.5-Air?
Qwen3.5 leads GLM-4.5-Air on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). GLM-4.5-Air shipped 203 days before Qwen3.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3.5 has 397B parameters, while GLM-4.5-Air has 106B.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Qwen3.5 leads at 76.4% vs GLM-4.5-Air at 59.8%.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.5 was released by Qwen on Feb 16 2026.
GLM-4.5-Air was released by Z.ai on Jul 28 2025.
Qwen3.5 leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Qwen3.5 76.4% vs GLM-4.5-Air 59.8%.
Other comparisons
Qwen3.5vsClaude Opus 5GLM-4.5-AirvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.5vsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.5-AirvsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.5vsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-4.5-AirvsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.5vsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.5-AirvsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5vsGrok 4.5GLM-4.5-AirvsGrok 4.5Qwen3.5vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-4.5-AirvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731