Qwen2.5-MaxvsGLM-4.7
Qwen2.5-Max | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | 32k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 73.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 41% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 85.7% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jan 28 2025 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Qwen2.5-Max or GLM-4.7?
Qwen2.5-Max and GLM-4.7 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Max shipped 328 days before GLM-4.7, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 32k (Qwen2.5-Max) vs 128k (GLM-4.7). Qwen2.5-Max is proprietary, while GLM-4.7 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen2.5-Max and GLM-4.7 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen2.5-Max was released by Qwen on Jan 28 2025.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
Qwen2.5-Max has a 32k context window; GLM-4.7 has 128k.
Qwen2.5-Max is a proprietary model released by Qwen. GLM-4.7 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Qwen2.5-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GLM-4.7vsClaude Opus 5Qwen2.5-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.7vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen2.5-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-4.7vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.7vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5-MaxvsGrok 4.5GLM-4.7vsGrok 4.5Qwen2.5-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-4.7vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731