o1vsQwen2
o1 | Qwen2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 72B |
Context window | 200k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 5 2024 | Jun 6 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: o1 or Qwen2?
o1 and Qwen2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2 shipped 182 days before o1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (o1) vs 128k (Qwen2). o1 is proprietary, while Qwen2 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — o1 and Qwen2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
o1 was released by OpenAI on Dec 5 2024.
Qwen2 was released by Qwen on Jun 6 2024.
o1 has a 200k context window; Qwen2 has 128k.
o1 is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. Qwen2 is an open weight model released by Qwen.