Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 117B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.016PrimeIntellect | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.06PrimeIntellect | — |
| $6.20PrimeIntellect · fp4 | $375SpaceXSI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 12% | 56% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 62.4% | 76.7% |
Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 14.9% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 19% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 80.1% | — |
MMLUGeneral knowledge — A 57-subject multiple-choice exam — history, law, medicine, maths — that was the standard measure of how much a model knows from 2020 until roughly 2024, when frontier scores crowded into the high 80s and labs moved on to harder tests. The scores here were published years apart under different testing setups, so read them as a historical record rather than a like-for-like ranking. Higher is better. | 90% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Aug 5 2025 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
gpt-oss-120bvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Haiku 5.5gpt-oss-120bvsGemini 4 CarbonGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 4 Carbongpt-oss-120bvsMuse Spark OpenGrok 4.20 BetavsMuse Spark Opengpt-oss-120bvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017gpt-oss-120bvsMistral Large 4Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Large 4gpt-oss-120bvsKimi K3.1 ProGrok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Grok 4.20 Beta leads gpt-oss-120b on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified). Only Grok 4.20 Beta has a verified first-party price for an available API: $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No currently available pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for gpt-oss-120b. gpt-oss-120b shipped 196 days before Grok 4.20 Beta, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
gpt-oss-120b is open weight, while Grok 4.20 Beta is closed.
On BullshitBench v2, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 56% vs gpt-oss-120b at 12%. On SWE-Bench Verified, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 76.7% vs gpt-oss-120b at 62.4%.