Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 816B | — |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
| — | $375SpaceXSI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 56% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 76.7% |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 89.2% | — |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 61.8% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1401 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Oct 15 2026 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark OpenvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark OpenvsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 4.20 BetavsGPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark OpenvsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark OpenvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGrok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark OpenvsMistral Large 4Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Large 4Muse Spark OpenvsKimi K3Grok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark Open and Grok 4.20 Beta don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Grok 4.20 Beta has a verified first-party API price: $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Muse Spark Open. Grok 4.20 Beta shipped 240 days before Muse Spark Open, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark Open is open weight, while Grok 4.20 Beta is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark Open and Grok 4.20 Beta don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.