GPT-5.6 LunavsGrok 4.20 Beta
GPT-5.6 Luna | Grok 4.20 Beta | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 40% | 56%Best |
Prompt injection robustness Gray Swan IPI · k = 1Attackers hide malicious instructions inside content the AI reads — a web page, an email, a document — and try to hijack what it does. Gray Swan's indirect prompt injection benchmark measures how often such an attack succeeds when the attacker gets a single try. Lower is better. | 8.3% | — |
Prompt injection robustness Gray Swan IPI · k = 10Attackers hide malicious instructions inside content the AI reads — a web page, an email, a document — and try to hijack what it does. This variant gives the attacker 10 tries and counts an attack as successful if any of them works. Lower is better. | 38.6% | — |
Prompt injection robustness Gray Swan IPI · k = 15Attackers hide malicious instructions inside content the AI reads — a web page, an email, a document — and try to hijack what it does. This variant gives the attacker 15 tries and counts an attack as successful if any of them works. Lower is better. | 43.9% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | 61.1% | — |
Agentic computer work Frontier-Bench v0.1A hard, ever-evolving set of real computer tasks — coding, system administration, data work, and more — that an AI agent has to complete on its own. Run by the Harbor / Laude Institute team as the successor to Terminal-Bench (v0.1 is the first release of the task set). The score is the share of tasks solved. Higher is better. | 14.3% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.5% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1475 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1523 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Jun 26 2026 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: GPT-5.6 Luna or Grok 4.20 Beta?
Grok 4.20 Beta leads GPT-5.6 Luna on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Grok 4.20 Beta shipped 129 days before GPT-5.6 Luna, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 56% vs GPT-5.6 Luna at 40%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.6 Luna was released by OpenAI on Jun 26 2026.
Grok 4.20 Beta was released by SpaceXAI on Feb 17 2026.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.6 LunavsClaude Opus 5Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 LunavsGemini 3.6 FlashGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 LunavsMuse GlimmerGrok 4.20 BetavsMuse GlimmerGPT-5.6 LunavsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Grok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GPT-5.6 LunavsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.6 LunavsKimi K3Grok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3