Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1.05M | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $30.00 | $1.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $180.00 | $2.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $15.00OpenAI | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $90.00OpenAI | — |
| $15,000OpenAI list price | $300SpaceXSI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 36% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 70.8% |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 65% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 90.1% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 84.2% | — |
FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 52.4% | — |
FrontierMath · Tier 4Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 39.6% | — |
GDPval (win/tie rate)Knowledge work — How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82.3% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Apr 23 2026 | Aug 28 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
GPT-5.5-ProvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok Code Fast 1vsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.5-ProvsGemini 4 ArgonGrok Code Fast 1vsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.5-ProvsMuse Spark OpenGrok Code Fast 1vsMuse Spark OpenGPT-5.5-ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok Code Fast 1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.5-ProvsMistral Large 4Grok Code Fast 1vsMistral Large 4GPT-5.5-ProvsKimi K3Grok Code Fast 1vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.5-Pro and Grok Code Fast 1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper on both input and output: $1.00 vs $30.00 per million input tokens, and $2.00 vs $180.00 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. Grok Code Fast 1 shipped 238 days before GPT-5.5-Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1.05M (GPT-5.5-Pro) vs 256k (Grok Code Fast 1).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5.5-Pro and Grok Code Fast 1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.