GPT-5.4-Pro vs GLM-5
OpenAI GPT-5.4-Pro | Z.ai GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Z.ai |
| Release date | Mar 5 2026 | Feb 12 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 744B |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.8% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 56.2% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 89.3%Best | 75.9% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 50.4% |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 94.4%Best | 86% |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | GLM-5 shipped 21 days before GPT-5.4-Pro | |
Which is better: GPT-5.4-Pro or GLM-5?
GPT-5.4-Pro leads GLM-5 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (BrowseComp, GPQA Diamond). GLM-5 shipped 21 days before GPT-5.4-Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
GPT-5.4-Pro is proprietary, while GLM-5 is open weight.
On BrowseComp, GPT-5.4-Pro leads at 89.3% vs GLM-5 at 75.9%. On GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.4-Pro leads at 94.4% vs GLM-5 at 86%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4-Pro was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
GLM-5 was released by Z.ai on Feb 12 2026.
GPT-5.4-Pro leads on GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.4-Pro 94.4% vs GLM-5 86%.
GPT-5.4-Pro is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. GLM-5 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.4-Pro vs Claude Fable 5GLM-5 vs Claude Fable 5GPT-5.4-Pro vs Gemini OmniGLM-5 vs Gemini OmniGPT-5.4-Pro vs Muse SparkGLM-5 vs Muse SparkGPT-5.4-Pro vs Grok 4.3 BetaGLM-5 vs Grok 4.3 BetaGPT-5.4-Pro vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGLM-5 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-5.4-Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5GLM-5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5