GPT-5.4-ProvsQwen3.7-Max
GPT-5.4-Pro | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 89.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 94.4%Best | 92.4% |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 5 2026 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: GPT-5.4-Pro or Qwen3.7-Max?
GPT-5.4-Pro leads Qwen3.7-Max on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). GPT-5.4-Pro shipped 76 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.4-Pro leads at 94.4% vs Qwen3.7-Max at 92.4%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4-Pro was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
GPT-5.4-Pro leads on GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.4-Pro 94.4% vs Qwen3.7-Max 92.4%.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.4-ProvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.4-ProvsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.4-ProvsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.4-ProvsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5GPT-5.4-ProvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GPT-5.4-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5