GPT-5.2vsQwen3.7-Max
GPT-5.2 | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 80% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 52.9% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 92.4% | 92.4% |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1476 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1419 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 11 2025 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.7-Max?
GPT-5.2 and Qwen3.7-Max are evenly matched across the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). GPT-5.2 shipped 160 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, both models score 92.4%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.2 was released by OpenAI on Dec 11 2025.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.2vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.2vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.2vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.2vsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5GPT-5.2vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GPT-5.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5