GPT-4 TurbovsQwen3.8-27B

GPT-4 Turbo
Qwen3.8-27B
Specifications
Parameters
27B
Context window
128k
262k
Benchmarks
Agentic coding
SWE-Bench Pro
61.7%
Agentic coding
DeepSWE 1.1
42.2%
Repo-level code generation
NL2Repo-Bench
42.3%
Software engineering
QwenSWEBench
79%
Competitive coding
LiveCodeBench
90.3%
Agentic terminal coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1
73%
Professional tool use
JobBench
33.4%
Long-horizon office work
CoWorkBench
70.7%
Multidisciplinary reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam · no tools
30.8%
Science
GPQA Diamond
42.5%
89.2%Best
Instruction following
IFBench
79.5%
Agentic computer use
Agent's Last Exam · pass@1
20.4%
Agentic computer use
Agent's Last Exam · score
42.9%
Overview
CompanyOpenAIQwen
Release dateNov 6 2023Aug 14 2026
AccessProprietaryOpen Weight

Which is better: GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B leads GPT-4 Turbo on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). GPT-4 Turbo shipped 1012 days before Qwen3.8-27B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 128k (GPT-4 Turbo) vs 262k (Qwen3.8-27B). GPT-4 Turbo is proprietary, while Qwen3.8-27B is open weight.

On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.8-27B leads at 89.2% vs GPT-4 Turbo at 42.5%.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4 Turbo was released by OpenAI on Nov 6 2023.

Qwen3.8-27B was released by Qwen on Aug 14 2026.

Qwen3.8-27B leads on GPQA Diamond — GPT-4 Turbo 42.5% vs Qwen3.8-27B 89.2%.

GPT-4 Turbo has a 128k context window; Qwen3.8-27B has 262k.

GPT-4 Turbo is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. Qwen3.8-27B is an open weight model released by Qwen.

Other comparisons