Nemotron 3.5 LightningvsComposer 2
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Composer 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 30B | — |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.04Darkbloom | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.18Darkbloom | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 51.6% | — |
SWE-Bench MultilingualMultilingual coding — Like SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 73.7% |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 58% |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 61.7% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Aug 11 2026 | Mar 19 2026 |
| Access | Open Source | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 LightningvsClaude Fable 5.1Composer 2vsClaude Fable 5.1Nemotron 3.5 LightningvsGPT-6 AstraComposer 2vsGPT-6 AstraNemotron 3.5 LightningvsGemini 3.8 FlashComposer 2vsGemini 3.8 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningvsMuse Spark 1.3Composer 2vsMuse Spark 1.3Nemotron 3.5 LightningvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashComposer 2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningvsMistral Medium 3.5Composer 2vsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Composer 2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Composer 2 shipped 145 days before Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is open source, while Composer 2 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Composer 2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.