Nemotron 3 SupervsQwen3.5
Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 120B | 397B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.60 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $3.60 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.10DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.15DeepInfra |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 60.5% | 76.4% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 79.2% | 88.4% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench MultilingualMultilingual coding — Like SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 69.3% |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 52.5% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 69% |
Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 28.7% |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 62.2% |
AA Intelligence IndexOverall intelligence — Artificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | 36 | — |
CharXiv ReasoningChart reasoning — Can the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 80.8% |
MMMU-ProMultimodal reasoning — A tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | — | 79% |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | — | 85% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 11 2026 | Feb 16 2026 |
| Access | Open Source | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.5 leads Nemotron 3 Super on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Verified, GPQA Diamond). Only Qwen3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3 Super. Qwen3.5 shipped 23 days before Nemotron 3 Super, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Nemotron 3 Super has 120B parameters, while Qwen3.5 has 397B. Context windows are 1M (Nemotron 3 Super) vs 1M (Qwen3.5). Nemotron 3 Super is open source, while Qwen3.5 is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Qwen3.5 leads at 76.4% vs Nemotron 3 Super at 60.5%. On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.5 leads at 88.4% vs Nemotron 3 Super at 79.2%.
Nemotron 3 Super was released by NVIDIA on Mar 11 2026.
Qwen3.5 was released by Qwen on Feb 16 2026.
Qwen3.5 leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Nemotron 3 Super 60.5% vs Qwen3.5 76.4%.
Qwen3.5 leads on GPQA Diamond — Nemotron 3 Super 79.2% vs Qwen3.5 88.4%.
Only Qwen3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3 Super. Rates are pay-as-you-go API prices verified on August 18, 2026.
Nemotron 3 Super has a 1M context window; Qwen3.5 has 1M.
Nemotron 3 Super is an open source model released by NVIDIA. Qwen3.5 is an open weight model released by Qwen.