Kimi K2.7 CodevsGLM-5
Kimi K2.7 Code | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 1T | 744B |
Context window | 256k | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 28% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.8% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | 49.7% | — |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 31% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 75% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 56.2% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 75.9% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 50.4% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1469Best | 1435 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jun 12 2026 | Feb 12 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: Kimi K2.7 Code or GLM-5?
Kimi K2.7 Code leads GLM-5 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Arena Elo (Code)). GLM-5 shipped 120 days before Kimi K2.7 Code, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2.7 Code has 1T parameters, while GLM-5 has 744B.
On Arena Elo (Code), Kimi K2.7 Code leads at 1469 vs GLM-5 at 1435.
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K2.7 Code was released by Moonshot AI on Jun 12 2026.
GLM-5 was released by Z.ai on Feb 12 2026.
Other comparisons
Kimi K2.7 CodevsClaude Opus 5GLM-5vsClaude Opus 5Kimi K2.7 CodevsGPT-5.6-CyberGLM-5vsGPT-5.6-CyberKimi K2.7 CodevsGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-5vsGemini 3.7 FlashKimi K2.7 CodevsMuse GlimmerGLM-5vsMuse GlimmerKimi K2.7 CodevsGrok 4.6GLM-5vsGrok 4.6Kimi K2.7 CodevsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GLM-5vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813