Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | 70B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.60Google | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $2.50Google | — |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 71.3% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Nov 6 2025 | Oct 15 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi K2 ThinkingvsClaude Haiku 5.5Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K2 ThinkingvsGPT-6.1 SolLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2 ThinkingvsGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2 ThinkingvsMuse Spark 1.3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi K2 ThinkingvsGrok 4.7Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsGrok 4.7Kimi K2 ThinkingvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Kimi K2 Thinking and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B shipped 387 days before Kimi K2 Thinking, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2 Thinking has 1T parameters, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B has 70B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K2 Thinking and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.