Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | 30B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.60Novita | $0.05Novita |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $2.50Novita | $0.20Novita |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.1% | 73% |
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 28% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 65.8% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 68.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Sep 5 2025 | Dec 15 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Source |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi K2 (0905)vsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3 NanovsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K2 (0905)vsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3 NanovsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2 (0905)vsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3 NanovsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2 (0905)vsMuse Spark 1.3Nemotron 3 NanovsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi K2 (0905)vsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3 NanovsGrok 4.7Kimi K2 (0905)vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3 NanovsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Kimi K2 (0905) leads Nemotron 3 Nano on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Kimi K2 (0905) shipped 101 days before Nemotron 3 Nano, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2 (0905) has 1T parameters, while Nemotron 3 Nano has 30B. Kimi K2 (0905) is open weight, while Nemotron 3 Nano is open source.
On GPQA Diamond, Kimi K2 (0905) leads at 75.1% vs Nemotron 3 Nano at 73%.