Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 128k | 200k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $15.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $60.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $7.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $15.00OpenAI |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $60.00OpenAI |
| — | $6,000OpenAI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 75.7% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jan 20 2025 | Dec 5 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K1.5 and o1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only o1 has a verified first-party API price: $15.00 per million input tokens and $60.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Kimi K1.5. o1 shipped 46 days before Kimi K1.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (Kimi K1.5) vs 200k (o1).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K1.5 and o1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.