Mistral NeMo vs GLM-5.1
Mistral Mistral NeMo | Z.ai GLM-5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jul 18 2024 | Apr 7 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 12B | 744B |
Context window | 128k | 200k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 22% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 75% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 63.5% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 52.3% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.2% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1527 |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | Mistral NeMo shipped 628 days before GLM-5.1 | |
Which is better: Mistral NeMo or GLM-5.1?
Mistral NeMo and GLM-5.1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral NeMo shipped 628 days before GLM-5.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral NeMo has 12B parameters, while GLM-5.1 has 744B. Context windows are 128k (Mistral NeMo) vs 200k (GLM-5.1).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral NeMo and GLM-5.1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Mistral NeMo was released by Mistral on Jul 18 2024.
GLM-5.1 was released by Z.ai on Apr 7 2026.
Mistral NeMo has a 128k context window; GLM-5.1 has 200k.
Other comparisons
Mistral NeMo vs Claude Sonnet 5GLM-5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5Mistral NeMo vs GPT-5.6 SolGLM-5.1 vs GPT-5.6 SolMistral NeMo vs Gemini OmniGLM-5.1 vs Gemini OmniMistral NeMo vs Muse Spark 1.1GLM-5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1Mistral NeMo vs Grok 4.5GLM-5.1 vs Grok 4.5Mistral NeMo vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGLM-5.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro