Muse Spark 1.2vsGLM-5.2

Muse Spark 1.2
GLM-5.2
Specifications
Parameters
744B
Context window
1M
1M
Benchmarks
Nonsense detection
BullshitBench v2
31%
Agentic coding
SWE-Bench Pro
62.1%
Agentic coding
CursorBench v3.2
55%
Agentic coding
CursorBench v3.1
54.6%
Agentic coding
DeepSWE 1.1
59.3%Best
44%
Next.js coding
Next.js Evals
88%
Agentic computer work
Frontier-Bench v0.1
5.1%
Agentic terminal coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1
82.9%Best
81%
Multidisciplinary reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam · no tools
40.5%
Multidisciplinary reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam · with tools
54.7%
Science
GPQA Diamond
91.2%
Knowledge work
GDPval-AA v2
1514
Community preference (code)
Arena Elo (Code)
1587
Overview
CompanyMetaZ.ai
Release dateAug 5 2026Jun 16 2026
AccessProprietaryOpen Weight

Which is better: Muse Spark 1.2 or GLM-5.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 leads GLM-5.2 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1). GLM-5.2 shipped 50 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 1M (GLM-5.2). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while GLM-5.2 is open weight.

On DeepSWE 1.1, Muse Spark 1.2 leads at 59.3% vs GLM-5.2 at 44%. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Muse Spark 1.2 leads at 82.9% vs GLM-5.2 at 81%.

Frequently asked questions

Muse Spark 1.2 was released by Meta on Aug 5 2026.

GLM-5.2 was released by Z.ai on Jun 16 2026.

Muse Spark 1.2 leads on DeepSWE 1.1 — Muse Spark 1.2 59.3% vs GLM-5.2 44%.

Muse Spark 1.2 has a 1M context window; GLM-5.2 has 1M.

Muse Spark 1.2 is a proprietary model released by Meta. GLM-5.2 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.

Other comparisons