Muse GlimmervsGLM-5.1
Muse Glimmer | GLM-5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 30B | 744B |
Context window | — | 200k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 22% |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 51.2% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 75% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 51.7% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 63.5% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 75.5% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 22% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 52.3% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 83.5% | 86.2%Best |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 953 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 78.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1468 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1518 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Z.ai |
| Release date | Aug 10 2026 | Apr 7 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Glimmer or GLM-5.1?
GLM-5.1 leads Muse Glimmer on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). GLM-5.1 shipped 125 days before Muse Glimmer, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Glimmer has 30B parameters, while GLM-5.1 has 744B.
On GPQA Diamond, GLM-5.1 leads at 86.2% vs Muse Glimmer at 83.5%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Glimmer was released by Meta on Aug 10 2026.
GLM-5.1 was released by Z.ai on Apr 7 2026.
GLM-5.1 leads on GPQA Diamond — Muse Glimmer 83.5% vs GLM-5.1 86.2%.
Other comparisons
Muse GlimmervsClaude Opus 5GLM-5.1vsClaude Opus 5Muse GlimmervsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-5.1vsGPT-5.6 SolMuse GlimmervsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-5.1vsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse GlimmervsGrok 4.5GLM-5.1vsGrok 4.5Muse GlimmervsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-5.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Muse GlimmervsMistral Medium 3.5GLM-5.1vsMistral Medium 3.5