Muse GlimmervsGLM-4.7
Muse Glimmer | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 30B | — |
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 51.2% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76%Best | 73.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 51.7% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 41% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 75.5% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 22% | 24.8%Best |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 83.5% | 85.7%Best |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 953 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 78.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Z.ai |
| Release date | Aug 10 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Glimmer or GLM-4.7?
GLM-4.7 leads Muse Glimmer on 2 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Verified, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond). GLM-4.7 shipped 231 days before Muse Glimmer, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Muse Glimmer leads at 76% vs GLM-4.7 at 73.8%. On Humanity's Last Exam · no tools, GLM-4.7 leads at 24.8% vs Muse Glimmer at 22%. On GPQA Diamond, GLM-4.7 leads at 85.7% vs Muse Glimmer at 83.5%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Glimmer was released by Meta on Aug 10 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
Muse Glimmer leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Muse Glimmer 76% vs GLM-4.7 73.8%.
GLM-4.7 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · no tools — Muse Glimmer 22% vs GLM-4.7 24.8%.