Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 235B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.70 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.80 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | $0.0482StreamLake |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.30DeepInfra | $0.1931StreamLake |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | 6% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Apr 29 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3vsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGPT-6.1 SolQwen3vsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 4 ArgonQwen3vsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.7Qwen3vsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Large 4Qwen3vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 4 Scout leads Qwen3 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only Qwen3 has a verified first-party API price: $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for LLaMA 4 Scout. LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 24 days before Qwen3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, LLaMA 4 Scout leads at 20% vs Qwen3 at 6%.