Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.30DeepInfra | — |
| $35.00DeepInfra · fp8 | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | 39% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | OpenAI |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Sep 15 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5-CodexvsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5-CodexvsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.7GPT-5-CodexvsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5-CodexvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Large 4GPT-5-CodexvsMistral Large 4LLaMA 4 ScoutvsKimi K3GPT-5-CodexvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
GPT-5-Codex leads LLaMA 4 Scout on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 163 days before GPT-5-Codex, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 4 Scout is open weight, while GPT-5-Codex is closed.
On BullshitBench v2, GPT-5-Codex leads at 39% vs LLaMA 4 Scout at 20%.