LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGPT-5-Codex
LLaMA 4 Scout | GPT-5-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.30DeepInfra | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 19% | 39% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | OpenAI |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Sep 15 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Opus 5GPT-5-CodexvsClaude Opus 5LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5-CodexvsGemini 3.7 FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.6GPT-5-CodexvsGrok 4.6LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GPT-5-CodexvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813LLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5-CodexvsMistral Medium 3.5LLaMA 4 ScoutvsKimi K3GPT-5-CodexvsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5-Codex leads LLaMA 4 Scout on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 163 days before GPT-5-Codex, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 4 Scout is open weight, while GPT-5-Codex is proprietary.
On BullshitBench v2, GPT-5-Codex leads at 39% vs LLaMA 4 Scout at 19%.
LLaMA 4 Scout was released by Meta on Apr 5 2025.
GPT-5-Codex was released by OpenAI on Sep 15 2025.
LLaMA 4 Scout is an open weight model released by Meta. GPT-5-Codex is a proprietary model released by OpenAI.