Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 30B |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | $0.05Crusoe |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.30DeepInfra | $0.20Crusoe |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | 28% |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 68.3% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 73% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Dec 15 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Source |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3 NanovsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3 NanovsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3 NanovsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3 NanovsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3 NanovsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Large 4Nemotron 3 NanovsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Nemotron 3 Nano leads LLaMA 4 Scout on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 254 days before Nemotron 3 Nano, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 4 Scout is open weight, while Nemotron 3 Nano is open source.
On BullshitBench v2, Nemotron 3 Nano leads at 28% vs LLaMA 4 Scout at 20%.