Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 70B | 1T |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | $0.57Novita |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.32DeepInfra | $2.30Novita |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 10% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 65.8% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 75.1% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Dec 6 2024 | Jul 11 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.3vsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K2vsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 3.3vsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2vsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 3.3vsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2vsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 3.3vsGrok 4.7Kimi K2vsGrok 4.7LLaMA 3.3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi K2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 3.3vsMistral Large 4Kimi K2vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.3 and Kimi K2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 3.3 shipped 217 days before Kimi K2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.3 has 70B parameters, while Kimi K2 has 1T.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.3 and Kimi K2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.