Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 70B | 24B |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.10DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.32DeepInfra | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Mistral |
| Release date | Dec 6 2024 | May 21 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.3vsClaude Haiku 5.5Devstral SmallvsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 3.3vsGPT-6.1 SolDevstral SmallvsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 3.3vsGemini 4 ArgonDevstral SmallvsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 3.3vsGrok 4.7Devstral SmallvsGrok 4.7LLaMA 3.3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDevstral SmallvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 3.3vsKimi K3Devstral SmallvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.3 and Devstral Small don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 3.3 shipped 166 days before Devstral Small, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.3 has 70B parameters, while Devstral Small has 24B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.3 and Devstral Small don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.