LLaMA 3.2 and Kimi-Dev don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 3.2 shipped 249 days before Kimi-Dev, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

LLaMA 3.2 has 1B/3B parameters, while Kimi-Dev has 72B.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.2 and Kimi-Dev don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.