Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.042Darkbloom | $0.10DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.22Darkbloom | $0.30DeepInfra |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 25% | 20% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | |
| Release date | Apr 2 2026 | Apr 5 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemma 4vsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemma 4vsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 4vsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.7Gemma 4vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemma 4vsMistral Large 4LLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Large 4Gemma 4vsKimi K3LLaMA 4 ScoutvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemma 4 leads LLaMA 4 Scout on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 362 days before Gemma 4, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Gemma 4 leads at 25% vs LLaMA 4 Scout at 20%.