Gemma 1vsMuse Spark 1.2
Gemma 1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $1.25Meta |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $4.25Meta |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 59.3% |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 82.9% |
Arena Elo (Text)Community preference — Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1498 |
Arena Elo (Code)Community preference (code) — Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1535 |
Arena Elo (Vision)Community preference (vision) — Real people give two anonymous AIs the same image — a photo, a screenshot, a diagram — and vote for whichever reads it better. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. It measures which AI people find more useful at looking at things, not how it scores on a fixed test set. Higher is better. | — | 1292 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | |
| Release date | Feb 21 2024 | Aug 5 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Gemma 1vsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Opus 5Gemma 1vsGPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.2vsGPT-5.6 SolGemma 1vsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.6Gemma 1vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Gemma 1vsMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Gemma 1vsKimi K3Muse Spark 1.2vsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
Gemma 1 and Muse Spark 1.2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemma 1 shipped 896 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemma 1 is open weight, while Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemma 1 and Muse Spark 1.2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Gemma 1 was released by Google on Feb 21 2024.
Muse Spark 1.2 was released by Meta on Aug 5 2026.
Gemma 1 is an open weight model released by Google. Muse Spark 1.2 is a proprietary model released by Meta.