DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 1M |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 59.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9%Best | 82.9% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | — |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1498 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1544 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Aug 5 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Muse Spark 1.2?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads Muse Spark 1.2 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.1). Muse Spark 1.2 shipped 8 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Terminal-Bench 2.1, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 87.9% vs Muse Spark 1.2 at 82.9%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
Muse Spark 1.2 was released by Meta on Aug 5 2026.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Terminal-Bench 2.1 — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 87.9% vs Muse Spark 1.2 82.9%.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberMuse Spark 1.2vsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsKimi K3Muse Spark 1.2vsKimi K3