Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 200k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $1.25 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $10.00 | — |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.125 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.625Google AI Studio | $1.10OpenAI |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $5.00Google AI Studio | $4.40OpenAI |
| $750Google list price | $440OpenAI | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 59.6% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 18.8% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 86.4% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | |
| Release date | Mar 25 2025 | Apr 16 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 2.5 ProvsClaude Haiku 5.5o4-mini-highvsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 ProvsMuse Spark Openo4-mini-highvsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.5 ProvsGrok 4.7o4-mini-highvsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017o4-mini-highvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.5 ProvsMistral Large 4o4-mini-highvsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 ProvsKimi K3o4-mini-highvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro and o4-mini-high don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a verified first-party API price: $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for o4-mini-high. Gemini 2.5 Pro shipped 22 days before o4-mini-high, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Gemini 2.5 Pro) vs 200k (o4-mini-high).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 2.5 Pro and o4-mini-high don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.