Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.10 | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $0.40 | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.01 | $0.20 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.05Google AI Studio | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.20Google AI Studio | — |
| $40.00Google list price | $375SpaceXSI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 31.6% | 76.7% |
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 56% |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | SpaceXSI | |
| Release date | Jun 17 2025 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 4.20 BetavsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark OpenGrok 4.20 BetavsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsKimi K3Grok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Grok 4.20 Beta leads Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on both input and output: $0.10 vs $1.25 per million input tokens, and $0.40 vs $2.50 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite shipped 245 days before Grok 4.20 Beta, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 76.7% vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite at 31.6%.