Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.4427StreamLake | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.8853StreamLake | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 93.5% | 74.8% |
CheatBenchCheating rate — Measures how often AI agents try to cheat on difficult assignments, such as reading hidden answers, copying work or manipulating grading. The overall score gives equal weight to ten categories; the sycophancy category measures how far an agent shifts its beliefs toward a user's stated views. Scores describe each model in its tested agent setup, and task success is measured separately. Lower is better. | 75.1% | — |
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 83.4% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 90.1% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Apr 24 2026 | Feb 17 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-ProvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3 minivsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 3 minivsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4-ProvsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 3 minivsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek-V4-ProvsMuse Spark 1.3Grok 3 minivsMuse Spark 1.3DeepSeek-V4-ProvsMistral Large 4Grok 3 minivsMistral Large 4DeepSeek-V4-ProvsKimi K3Grok 3 minivsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro leads Grok 3 mini on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (LiveCodeBench). Grok 3 mini shipped 431 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is open weight, while Grok 3 mini is closed.
On LiveCodeBench, DeepSeek-V4-Pro leads at 93.5% vs Grok 3 mini at 74.8%.