DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGemini 3.0 Flash
DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemini 3.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | — |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 49.6% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 78% |
Competitive coding LiveCodeBenchCoding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 93.5% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 58% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 62% |
General tool use ToolathlonTests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | — | 49.4% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 83.4% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 33.7% |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 33.6% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 90.1% | 90.4%Best |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 65.1% |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | — | 42.6% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AAMeasures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | — | 1204 |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | — | 81.2% |
Spatial reasoning Blueprint-Bench 2Can the AI reason about space and layout — for example, understanding a floor plan or blueprint? Higher is better. | — | 0% |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 128k averageTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside a very long document (around 128k tokens — roughly a long book). Higher is better. | — | 67.2% |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 1M pointwiseTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside an enormous document (around 1 million tokens — many books). Higher is better. | — | 22.1% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1457Best | 1437 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Apr 24 2026 | Dec 17 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 3.0 Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 3.0 Flash are evenly matched across the 2 benchmarks they both report (GPQA Diamond, Arena Elo (Code)). Gemini 3.0 Flash shipped 128 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is open weight, while Gemini 3.0 Flash is proprietary.
On GPQA Diamond, Gemini 3.0 Flash leads at 90.4% vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro at 90.1%. On Arena Elo (Code), DeepSeek-V4-Pro leads at 1457 vs Gemini 3.0 Flash at 1437.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro was released by DeepSeek on Apr 24 2026.
Gemini 3.0 Flash was released by Google on Dec 17 2025.
Gemini 3.0 Flash leads on GPQA Diamond — DeepSeek-V4-Pro 90.1% vs Gemini 3.0 Flash 90.4%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is an open weight model released by DeepSeek. Gemini 3.0 Flash is a proprietary model released by Google.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-ProvsClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsClaude Sonnet 5DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.0 FlashvsGPT-5.6 SolDeepSeek-V4-ProvsMuse Spark 1.1Gemini 3.0 FlashvsMuse Spark 1.1DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsGrok 4.5DeepSeek-V4-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-ProvsKimi K3Gemini 3.0 FlashvsKimi K3