DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGLM-5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 744B |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 28% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.8% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 56.2% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 75.9% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60%Best | 50.4% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1435 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Feb 12 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-5?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads GLM-5 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Humanity's Last Exam). GLM-5 shipped 182 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is proprietary, while GLM-5 is open weight.
On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 60% vs GLM-5 at 50.4%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
GLM-5 was released by Z.ai on Feb 12 2026.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · with tools — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 60% vs GLM-5 50.4%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is a proprietary model released by DeepSeek. GLM-5 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsClaude Opus 5GLM-5vsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberGLM-5vsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-5vsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse GlimmerGLM-5vsMuse GlimmerDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6GLM-5vsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5GLM-5vsMistral Medium 3.5