Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 671B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.2088GMICloud | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.3096GMICloud | — |
| $57.24GMICloud · fp8 | $375SpaceXSI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 13% | 56% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 76.7% |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Dec 1 2025 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V3.2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.2vsGPT-6.1 TerraGrok 4.20 BetavsGPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek-V3.2vsGemini 4 CarbonGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 4 CarbonDeepSeek-V3.2vsMuse Spark OpenGrok 4.20 BetavsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek-V3.2vsMistral Large 4Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Large 4DeepSeek-V3.2vsKimi K3.1 ProGrok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Grok 4.20 Beta leads DeepSeek-V3.2 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only Grok 4.20 Beta has a verified first-party price for an available API: $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No currently available pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for DeepSeek-V3.2. DeepSeek-V3.2 shipped 78 days before Grok 4.20 Beta, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V3.2 is open weight, while Grok 4.20 Beta is closed.
On BullshitBench v2, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 56% vs DeepSeek-V3.2 at 13%.