Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.259SiliconFlow | $0.05DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.38DeepInfra | $0.10DeepInfra |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 13% | 3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Dec 1 2025 | Mar 12 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V3.2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemma 3vsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek-V3.2vsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 3vsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V3.2vsMuse Spark 1.3Gemma 3vsMuse Spark 1.3DeepSeek-V3.2vsGrok 4.7Gemma 3vsGrok 4.7DeepSeek-V3.2vsMistral Large 4Gemma 3vsMistral Large 4DeepSeek-V3.2vsKimi K3Gemma 3vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V3.2 leads Gemma 3 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Gemma 3 shipped 264 days before DeepSeek-V3.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, DeepSeek-V3.2 leads at 13% vs Gemma 3 at 3%.