Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.40 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $1.60 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.25DeepInfra | $0.32Alibaba |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.95DeepInfra | $1.28Alibaba |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 66% | 77.7% |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 74.8% | 89.6% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 15.9% | 34.7% |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 21 2025 | Jun 1 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1vsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.7-PlusvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V3.1vsGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7-PlusvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V3.1vsGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7-PlusvsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V3.1vsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.7-PlusvsMuse Spark 1.3DeepSeek V3.1vsGrok 4.7Qwen3.7-PlusvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek V3.1vsMistral Large 4Qwen3.7-PlusvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.7-Plus leads DeepSeek V3.1 on 3 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Verified, LiveCodeBench, Humanity's Last Exam). Only Qwen3.7-Plus has a verified first-party API price: $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for DeepSeek V3.1. DeepSeek V3.1 shipped 284 days before Qwen3.7-Plus, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek V3.1 is open weight, while Qwen3.7-Plus is closed.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Qwen3.7-Plus leads at 77.7% vs DeepSeek V3.1 at 66%. On LiveCodeBench, Qwen3.7-Plus leads at 89.6% vs DeepSeek V3.1 at 74.8%. On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, Qwen3.7-Plus leads at 34.7% vs DeepSeek V3.1 at 15.9%.