Composer 2.5 vs GLM-4.7
Cursor Composer 2.5 | Z.ai GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Cursor | Z.ai |
| Release date | May 18 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 73.8% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 79.8% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.1Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor. Higher is better. | 63.2% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 69.3%Best | 41% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 85.7% |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | GLM-4.7 shipped 147 days before Composer 2.5 | |
Which is better: Composer 2.5 or GLM-4.7?
Composer 2.5 leads GLM-4.7 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.0). GLM-4.7 shipped 147 days before Composer 2.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Composer 2.5 is proprietary, while GLM-4.7 is open weight.
On Terminal-Bench 2.0, Composer 2.5 leads at 69.3% vs GLM-4.7 at 41%.
Frequently asked questions
Composer 2.5 was released by Cursor on May 18 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
Composer 2.5 leads on Terminal-Bench 2.0 — Composer 2.5 69.3% vs GLM-4.7 41%.
Composer 2.5 is a proprietary model released by Cursor. GLM-4.7 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Composer 2.5 vs Claude Fable 5GLM-4.7 vs Claude Fable 5Composer 2.5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.6 SolComposer 2.5 vs Gemini OmniGLM-4.7 vs Gemini OmniComposer 2.5 vs Muse SparkGLM-4.7 vs Muse SparkComposer 2.5 vs Grok 4.3 BetaGLM-4.7 vs Grok 4.3 BetaComposer 2.5 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGLM-4.7 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro