Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 1T |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $3.00Amazon Bedrock | $0.57Novita |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $15.00Amazon Bedrock | $2.30Novita |
| $1,350Amazon Bedrock | $229Novita · fp8 | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 30% | 10% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 72.7% | 65.8% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.4% | 75.1% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 4.7% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | May 22 2025 | Jul 11 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4vsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 4vsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2vsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Sonnet 4vsMuse WonderKimi K2vsMuse WonderClaude Sonnet 4vsGrok 4.7Kimi K2vsGrok 4.7Claude Sonnet 4vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi K2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Sonnet 4vsMistral Large 4Kimi K2vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude Sonnet 4 leads Kimi K2 on 3 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified, GPQA Diamond). Claude Sonnet 4 shipped 50 days before Kimi K2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude Sonnet 4 is closed, while Kimi K2 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Claude Sonnet 4 leads at 30% vs Kimi K2 at 10%. On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Sonnet 4 leads at 72.7% vs Kimi K2 at 65.8%. On GPQA Diamond, Claude Sonnet 4 leads at 75.4% vs Kimi K2 at 75.1%.