Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
| — | $375SpaceXSI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 34% | 56% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 72.5% | 76.7% |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 79.6% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | May 22 2025 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4vsGPT-6.1 TerraGrok 4.20 BetavsGPT-6.1 TerraClaude Opus 4vsGemini 4 CarbonGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 4 CarbonClaude Opus 4vsMuse Spark OpenGrok 4.20 BetavsMuse Spark OpenClaude Opus 4vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Opus 4vsMistral Large 4Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Large 4Claude Opus 4vsKimi K3.1 ProGrok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Grok 4.20 Beta leads Claude Opus 4 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified). Only Grok 4.20 Beta has a verified first-party price for an available API: $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No currently available pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Opus 4. Claude Opus 4 shipped 271 days before Grok 4.20 Beta, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 56% vs Claude Opus 4 at 34%. On SWE-Bench Verified, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 76.7% vs Claude Opus 4 at 72.5%.