Claude Opus 4vsKimi K2 Thinking
Claude Opus 4 | Kimi K2 Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 1T |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $15.00Google | $0.60Google |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $75.00Google | $2.50Google |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 72.5% | 71.3% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 34% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 79.6% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | May 22 2025 | Nov 6 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4vsGPT-5.6 SolKimi K2 ThinkingvsGPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4vsGemini 3.7 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingvsGemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 4vsMuse GlimmerKimi K2 ThinkingvsMuse GlimmerClaude Opus 4vsGrok 4.6Kimi K2 ThinkingvsGrok 4.6Claude Opus 4vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Kimi K2 ThinkingvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Claude Opus 4vsMistral Medium 3.5Kimi K2 ThinkingvsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4 leads Kimi K2 Thinking on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Claude Opus 4 shipped 168 days before Kimi K2 Thinking, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude Opus 4 is proprietary, while Kimi K2 Thinking is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Opus 4 leads at 72.5% vs Kimi K2 Thinking at 71.3%.
Claude Opus 4 was released by Anthropic on May 22 2025.
Kimi K2 Thinking was released by Moonshot AI on Nov 6 2025.
Claude Opus 4 leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Claude Opus 4 72.5% vs Kimi K2 Thinking 71.3%.
Claude Opus 4 is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. Kimi K2 Thinking is an open weight model released by Moonshot AI.