Claude Opus 4vsKimi K2
Claude Opus 4 | Kimi K2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 1T |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $15.00Google | $0.57Novita |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $75.00Google | $2.30Novita |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 34% | 10% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 72.5% | 65.8% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 79.6% | 75.1% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | May 22 2025 | Jul 11 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4 leads Kimi K2 on 3 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified, GPQA Diamond). Claude Opus 4 shipped 50 days before Kimi K2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude Opus 4 is proprietary, while Kimi K2 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Claude Opus 4 leads at 34% vs Kimi K2 at 10%. On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Opus 4 leads at 72.5% vs Kimi K2 at 65.8%. On GPQA Diamond, Claude Opus 4 leads at 79.6% vs Kimi K2 at 75.1%.
Claude Opus 4 was released by Anthropic on May 22 2025.
Kimi K2 was released by Moonshot AI on Jul 11 2025.
Claude Opus 4 leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Claude Opus 4 72.5% vs Kimi K2 65.8%.
Claude Opus 4 leads on GPQA Diamond — Claude Opus 4 79.6% vs Kimi K2 75.1%.
Claude Opus 4 is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. Kimi K2 is an open weight model released by Moonshot AI.