Compare AI models

API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
—$0.50DeepInfra
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
—$2.15DeepInfra
—$208DeepInfra · fp4
Benchmarks
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better.
34%8%
Overview
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release dateMay 22 2025May 28 2025
AccessClosedOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

Claude Opus 4 leads DeepSeek R1-0528 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Claude Opus 4 shipped 6 days before DeepSeek R1-0528, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Claude Opus 4 is closed, while DeepSeek R1-0528 is open weight.

On BullshitBench v2, Claude Opus 4 leads at 34% vs DeepSeek R1-0528 at 8%.