Claude Opus 4.6vsQwen3.7-Max
Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 87% | — |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 75% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 83.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 53% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.3% | 92.4%Best |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1504 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1543 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Feb 5 2026 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads Claude Opus 4.6 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Claude Opus 4.6 shipped 104 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 92.4% vs Claude Opus 4.6 at 91.3%.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.6 was released by Anthropic on Feb 5 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on GPQA Diamond — Claude Opus 4.6 91.3% vs Qwen3.7-Max 92.4%.
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.7-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.6vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashClaude Opus 4.6vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.6vsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5Claude Opus 4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Claude Opus 4.6vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5