Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 vs Meta LLaMA 1 — side-by-side specs.
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 | Meta LLaMA 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release date | Feb 5 2026 | Feb 24 2023 |
| Model type | — | — |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | — |
Context window | — | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.3% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | LLaMA 1 shipped 1077 days before Claude Opus 4.6 | |
Claude Opus 4.6 and LLaMA 1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 1 shipped 1077 days before Claude Opus 4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 1 is an open-source / open-weight model; Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Opus 4.6 and LLaMA 1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.