Claude Opus 4.1vsNemotron 3 Nano
Claude Opus 4.1 | Nemotron 3 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 30B |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $15.00Amazon Bedrock | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $75.00Amazon Bedrock | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 80.9% | 73% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 43% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 74.5% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 68.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Aug 5 2025 | Dec 15 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Source |
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.1vsGPT-5.6 SolNemotron 3 NanovsGPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.1vsGemini 3.7 FlashNemotron 3 NanovsGemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 4.1vsMuse GlimmerNemotron 3 NanovsMuse GlimmerClaude Opus 4.1vsGrok 4.6Nemotron 3 NanovsGrok 4.6Claude Opus 4.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Nemotron 3 NanovsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Claude Opus 4.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Nemotron 3 NanovsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.1 leads Nemotron 3 Nano on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Claude Opus 4.1 shipped 132 days before Nemotron 3 Nano, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude Opus 4.1 is proprietary, while Nemotron 3 Nano is open source.
On GPQA Diamond, Claude Opus 4.1 leads at 80.9% vs Nemotron 3 Nano at 73%.
Claude Opus 4.1 was released by Anthropic on Aug 5 2025.
Nemotron 3 Nano was released by NVIDIA on Dec 15 2025.
Claude Opus 4.1 leads on GPQA Diamond — Claude Opus 4.1 80.9% vs Nemotron 3 Nano 73%.
Claude Opus 4.1 is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. Nemotron 3 Nano is an open source model released by NVIDIA.