Claude Opus 4.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Claude Opus 4.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | |
|---|---|---|
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.22 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $0.66 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.007 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $15.00Amazon Bedrock | $0.04OpenInference |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $75.00Amazon Bedrock | $0.10OpenInference |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 43% | 39% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 74.5% | 79% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 82.7% |
Toolathlon-VerifiedPersonal tool use — Tests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | — | 70.3% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 73.2% |
CyberGymCybersecurity — Tests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | — | 76.7% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 34.8% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 80.9% | — |
AutomationBenchBusiness workflows — Tests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | — | 25.1% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release date | Aug 5 2025 | Jul 31 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.1vsGPT-6 AstraDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.1vsGemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 4.1vsMuse Spark 1.3DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Opus 4.1vsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGrok 4.6Claude Opus 4.1vsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMistral Medium 3.5Claude Opus 4.1vsKimi K3DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 are evenly matched across the 2 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified). Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a verified first-party API price: $0.22 per million input tokens and $0.66 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Opus 4.1 shipped 360 days before DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Claude Opus 4.1 leads at 43% vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at 39%. On SWE-Bench Verified, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads at 79% vs Claude Opus 4.1 at 74.5%.